Answer:
The person doing the interview would be a secondary source, the historyian would be a primery source.
Explanation:
Answer:
So much can be read into the fact that the king is "semi-barbaric". He does know right from wrong, but he chooses to ignore it and go with with whatever he fancies. In a sense, this makes him, perhaps, the worse kind of character. He does, in fact, know that his ways are evil and subject to incorrect chance, but he does not care. He sees his method as a perfect fifty percent to fifty percent, so according to him, it is fair.
Still, he has to know that this is a less than perfect system--in fact, it is a complete fallacy.
When we think about it, this may make him the most despicable and contemptible of characters. He goes against whatever conscience he may have
Explanation:
She paused infrequently, as if attempting to discover the correct wording to explain to them what she longed for them to understand, then the pencil would recommence its muttering on the script.
