Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
Dedicated athletes, like a marathon runners
Explanation:
Given:
July 1 borrowed money from eight national bank on 8-month, 40,000, 5% note.
Interest and principal is all due on February 28
No journal entries were made.
Recognizing cash and notes payable.
Debit Credit
Cash 40,000
Notes Payable 40,000
Interest on Notes payable
Interest Expense 1,333
Interest Payable 1,333
Recognizing interest owed but not yet paid.
40,000 * 5% * 8/12 = 1,333
On February:
Notes Payable 40,000
Interest Payable 1,333
Cash 41,333
<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment.
Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The net realizable values are as follows
ai For accounts receivables
Ending balance of account receivables = Beginning balance of account receivables + Credit sale - Collections uncollectible amount
= $187,800 + $860,400 - $687,720
= $360,480
aii For allowance for doubtful debt
= Beginning balance + Previously written off amount - Uncollectible amount + Bad debt expense
= $9,630 + $2,859 - $7,381 + $18,412
= $23,070