Answer: C. 1200 hour
Explanation:
It is indeed 1200 hours because the units produced increased by 20% and therefore, theoretically, so should the time.
Answer:
Overhead at the end of the year was $3,570 under-applied
Explanation:
For computing the ended overhead amount, first, we have to compute the predetermined overhead rate. The formula is shown below:
Predetermined overhead rate = (Total estimated manufacturing overhead) ÷ (estimated direct labor-hours)
= $521,220 ÷ 21,900 hours
= $23.8
Now we have to find the actual overhead which equals to
= Actual direct labor-hours × predetermined overhead rate
= 21,750 hours × $23.8
= $517,650
So, the ending overhead equals to
= Actual manufacturing overhead - actual overhead
= $521,220 - $517,650
= $3,570 under-applied
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Atleast 5 dollars because of how there is a limited supply of gasoline today
Job b will go out of business sooner if their profit is the same as A