Answer:
The economic surplus will decrease by $2.20
Explanation:
$81.40 and $79.20 are <em>marginal </em>cost and benefit, which are the changes to total costs and total benefits due to producing and consuming one additional barrel of oil.
They can be used to calculate <em>change </em>to economic surplus, which is the change to the net economic value received by society, which is given by:
marginal benefit - marginal cost = $79.20 - $81.40 = - $2.20
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Taj Mahal is one of the greatest monument in the world. It is very beautiful. It is located in India. It is made up of white marble. Many people from all parts of the world come to visit Taj Mahal.
But recently the color of the marble changes its color to light yellow due to pollution. The companies near by are emitting harmful gases to the atmosphere for which the color of the white marble changed its color and became light yellowish brown.
In the context, company ABC Limited still operating near the Taj Mahal is not fulfilling its responsibility as it is destroying the beauty and existence of the world famous Taj Mahal.
Answer:
The value of the firm according to M&M Proposition I with taxes is $513,824.62
Explanation:
Value of firm = [EBIT x (1-Tax) / Equity Cost] + [Debt x Tax rate]
Value of firm = 82000 x (1-24%) / 13% + 143500 x 24%
Value of firm = 62320 / 0.13 + 143500 x 0.24
Value of firm = 479,384.62 + 34,440
Value of firm = $513,824.62
Answer: The relationship between A and B project cannot be determined with the information given.
Explanation: The relationship between PW(A) and PW(B) is the correlation between project A and Project B in a portfolio.
This is not possible to be calculated with the information given.
But an expression of calculating this is;
PW is the present value of A and B projects.
MARR is the minimum acceptable rate of return
The calculate the correlation of the two project, divide MARR by the multiple of the two project.
That is;
Correlation = MARR ÷ [PW(A) × PW(B)]
Therefore;
Correlation = i11% ÷ [PW(A) × PW(B)]
This shows that the relationship cannot be determined with the limited Information supplied.
Answer:
Wyatt
Explanation:
High outcome interpendence is a concept that encourages cooperation between members on a team. It shows that if a team wins all members will benefit, and if the team fails all members will be adversely affected.
In this scenario Wyatt who is a slacker in the team of Nick will stand to gain more.
In a high outcome interpendence scenario Nick will be forced to improve on the performance of Wyatt in order to meet team objectives.
The other average workers will only gain a little from increased cooperation.