Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4) parallel because 118° is a supplement to 62° and the corresponding angles are both 118°
5) NOT parallel. The labeled angles sum to 120° and would sum to 180° for parallel lines.
6) NOT parallel. see pic.
If parallel, extending a line to intersect ℓ₁ makes an opposite internal angle which would also be 48°. The created triangle would have its third angle at 180 - 90 - 48 = 42° which is opposite a labeled 48° angle, which is false, so the lines cannot be parallel
7)
b = 78° as it corresponds with a labeled angle above it
a = 180 - 78 = 102° as angles along a line from a common vertex sum to 180
f = is an opposite angle to 180 - 78 - 44 = 58° as angles along a line from a common vertex sum to 180
e = 180 - 90 - 64 = 26° as angles along a line from a common vertex sum to 180
c = 58° as it corresponds with f
d = 180 - 58 = 122° as angles along a line from a common vertex sum to 180
Answer:
The approximate probability is 0.7325.
Is not unlikely that a driver in that age bracket is involved in a car crash during a year, so there are reasons to be concerned.
Step-by-step explanation:
The approximate probability can be estimated using the sample proportion:
A probability of 0.7325 is high, so it is not unlikely that a driver in that age bracket is involved in a car crash during a year.
As this value is high, there is reasons to be concerned about it.
Well, minusing 8 from every t just moved theh function to the right 8 units
it had no effect on the number of t intercepts (horizontal is t axis instaead of x axis)
originally, it has 1 t intercept at t=0
now it still has 1 t intercept, but now it is at t=8
Answer:
the answer to the question is c
Answer:
400
Step-by-step explanation:
20%/14% = 1.42857
1.42857 x 280 = 400.