Answer:
C.-1.6
Step-by-step explanation:
distance: -1 - (-2) = 1
1 ÷ 5 = 1/5
-1 - 1/5 × 3 = -1 3/5 = -1.6
<h3>
Answer: B. (-1, 0)</h3>
This point is below both the red diagonal line and the blue parabola. We know that the set of solution points is below both due to the "less than" parts of each inequality sign.
In contrast, a point like (2,2) is above the parabola which is why it is not a solution. It does not make the inequality true. So this is why we can rule choice A out.
Choice C is not a solution because (4,1) does not make true. This point is not below the red diagonal line. We can cross choice C off the list.
Choice D is similar to choice A, which is why we can rule it out as well.
We have been provided a diagram which tells us that Patti drew vertical line segments from two points to the line in her scatter plot. The first point she selected was dwarf crocodile. The second point she selected was for an Indian Gharial crocodile.
We can see that dwarf crocodile's bite force is closer to line of best fit than Indian Gharial crocodile. Indian Gharial crocodile seems to be an outlier for our data set.
Therefore, Patti's line have resulted in a predicted bite force that was closer to actual bite force for the dwarf crocodile.
There is no statements to choose from
Answer:
$35.50
Step-by-step explanation:
55.50-48= 7.5
2008-2005 = 3
7.5 divided by 3 = 2.5 per year
2005-2000 = 5 multipled by 2.5 = 12.5
48-12.5=35.5