Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly
Answer:
1. Their trip is being orginized by a travel agent
2. Sally is getting her hair cut
3. all the tickets have been sold in a week.
4. our tickets will be booked tomorow.
5. cameras are not allowed in the museum.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. They often are about people who lead relatively ordinary lives and have not done anything famous.
Explanation:
Some modern biographies and autobiographies are different from classic biographies and autobiographies in terms of content because they often are about people who lead relatively ordinary lives and have not done anything famous.
This is because, classic biographies and autobiographies were usually done for important people so that ordinary people could read about their life. However, in recent times, autobiographies and biographies can be done for the common man.
Noun- general item(s)
Pronoun- specific thing(s)
I hope this helps! :)
