The parts that are missing in the proof are:
It is given
∠2 ≅ ∠3
converse alternate exterior angles theorem
<h3>What is the Converse of Alternate Exterior Angles Theorem?</h3>
The theorem states that, if two exterior alternate angles are congruent, then the lines cut by the transversal are parallel.
∠1 ≅ ∠3 and l║m because we are: given
By the transitive property,
∠2 and ∠3 are alternate interior angles, therefore, they are congruent to each other by the alternate interior angles theorem.
Based on the converse alternate exterior angles theorem, lines p and q are proven to be parallel.
Therefore, the missing parts pf the paragraph proof are:
- It is given
- ∠2 ≅ ∠3
- converse alternate exterior angles theorem
Learn more about the converse alternate exterior angles theorem on:
brainly.com/question/17883766
#SPJ1
The short answer: yes.
Explanation: every rational number can be expressed as, well, a ratio. For instance, 5 can be expressed as 5/1 and 1.75 can be expressed as 7/4. Irrational numbers are not rational. For instance, pi... there is no ration for pi.
You think I know right? yeah so no way boy I'm so sorry not my intencion
Answer:
Rate of change = (1350 - 750)/(2010 - 2000) = 600/10 = $60
Initial value = $750
Equation is y = 60x + 750; where y is the amount charged to customer and x is the number of years from 2000.
Answer:
Apparently i cant see the photo im am so sorry but do need pints.
Step-by-step explanation: