Answer:
Comparing financial statement amounts from year to year for the same company
Explanation:
When you carry out a horizontal analysis of the financial statements of a corporation you compare how the different accounts have changed over a period of time.
For example, you can perform a horizontal analysis to determine how total costs affect net profits in the income statement. You take the 2017, 2018 and 2019 income statements and compare how total costs have evolved during that period or time, and what percentage do they represent of total revenue.
<span>A monopolist sells 6 units of a product per day at a unit price of $15. if it lowers price to $14, its total revenue increases by $22. this implies that its sales quantity increases by: 8 units.
To solve for the original sales amount: (6 units)($15) = $90
Next find the new unit amount: (8 units)($14) = $112
The difference between these two is a $22 sales increase which means to have the difference in sales be $22 there were 8 units sold instead of 6 units.
</span>
Answer:
elastic, because many other firms produce the same standardized product
Explanation:
A good has perfect price elasticity when a change in price leads to an infinite change of quantity demanded.
A perfect competition is when there are many buyers of homogenous goods and services. The sellers are price takers; prices are set by the market force.
A perfect competition has perfect price elasticity because goods sold are standardised and identical with other goods in the market. If the seller increases its price, it's demand would fall to zero as consumers would shift demand to other subsituite goods.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
William would win the court ruling becuase Gertie saw the truck and knew it was going to hit william
Explanation:
The answer is Yes because Sylvia will have to pay Sarah for painting the store even though she did not verbally agree to the contract.
<h3>What is a
Contract?</h3>
A Contract is a formal arrangement between two or more party where one promise to perform a duty in return for a consideration (value).
In conclusion, the answer is Yes because Sylvia will have to pay Sarah for painting the store even though she did not verbally agree to the contract.
Read more about Contract
<em>brainly.com/question/984979</em>