Answer:
take the payments over time payout
Explanation:
My personal opinion/advice would be to take the payments over time payout. There are many reasons for this, the first one being that most individuals are not used to receiving large sums of cash and usually end up wasting all the money as soon as they receive it, which usually does not occur if the payments are made over time. The second and more important reason is that if the payments are made over different years your would pay a much lesser amount on taxes every year that passes. This means that the even with the interest rate you would most likely have more overall money if you take the payments over time.
Answer:
management has not explained its business purpose
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the firm is engaged in the new financial transaction that contains the material impact on the earnings so this represents that it could be come under the pre existed accounting standards.
Also everyone should be aware of the business purpose plus it is not established for changing off the financial statements
So it would be suspicious because the purpose of the business could not be explained
Answer:
The $5,400 is the amount should Bad Brads BBQ record the equipment.
Explanation:
According to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the amount of asset is recorded at cost or fair market value which ever is lower.
The motive behind this is to present the financial statement in true and fair value rather than mislead values.
Since in the given question, the equipment purchase cost is $5,000 and shipping charges is $400.
So,
The total cost is = Purchase cost + shipping charges
= $5,000 + $400
= $5,400
And, the fair market value is $7,000.
By using the above explanation, the $5400 is the lesser amount than the $7,000.
Hence, the $5,400 is the amount should Bad Brads BBQ record the equipment.
I think it would be “oligopoly”
Answer:
B. structural unemployment will exist in an economy that is innovative
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the relevant issue he is ignoring is that structural unemployment will exist in an economy that is innovative. This is because innovative economies tend to constantly be going through industrial change to implement the new innovations, this causes a need for only individuals that are specifically skilled and leaving unemployed the people who are not.
