Answer:
1. False
2. Shortage; Larger
Explanation:
1. A binding price ceiling is one that prevents the market from reaching its equilibrium. In this market, the equilibrium price is $25 therefore anything below $25 will be binding. A price ceiling below $25 per box is a binding ceiling.
2<em>. Assuming that the long-run demand for oranges is the same as the short-run demand, you would expect a binding price ceiling to result in a </em><em><u>shortage</u></em><em> that is </em><em><u>larger</u></em><em> in the long run than in the short run.</em>
In the long run, supply is more sensitive because farmers can decide to plant oranges on their land, to plant something else, or to sell their land altogether.
This means that a price ceiling in the long run will be less attractive to farmers so they might leave the market. If they do this then the shortage will be more as there are now less supplies in the market.
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B
.
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Eligible for legal citizenship = 63%
Error = 3%
Level of confidence = 95%
Here, the CI is 63% ± 3% , which means 60% to 66% and this indicates that with 95% confidence, the true proportion lies between this interval
This is shown by option B
Hence, option B is correct answer
Answer:
This is an example of switch trading.
Explanation:
Switch trading is defined as a practice where one company goes into agreement with another company located in a different country to commit in the purchase of each company’s goods and services. This common practice is part of the countertrading category, which is the exchange of goods and services with other goods and services. Other examples of countertrading include barter, counter purchase, buyback, offset, and compensation trade.
Answer: sunk costs don't increase as driving increases.
Explanation: sunk costs are irrelevant costs because they have already occured in the past and cannot be avoided. Sunk costs thus do not differ between alternatives, and are unavoidable. The calculation for insurance and other sunk costs are likely not based on the amount of rides the Uber picks up, but rather calculated at a constant rate. So regardless of whether or not the rider pays more or less than the $.50 on the insurance, this will not have any effect on the insurance that is constant and has likely already been paid out.
Answer:
The federal government can regulate Jen's activity citing the supreme court rule of the government ability to regulate any activity interstate or intrastate that affects interstate commerce.
In the line of this argument it means that a farmer growing and of goods affects interstate commerce.
The farmers best argument concerning the federal government regulating their activities due to interstate commerce is that his activities are purely local and although I don't believe any court will hear him out.
Explanation:
