Answer:
flank attack
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this is an example of a flank attack. This is the marketing strategy that focuses on attacking the different weak points of the competitors in the market. Which is what Colgate is doing by focusing on the one aspect that Pepsodent has not targeted in order to overtake all of their market share on their newly launched product.
If the country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost, it has a comparative advantage.
<h3>
What is comparative advantage?</h3>
- In an economic model, agents have a comparative advantage over others if they can produce that good at a lower relative opportunity cost or autarky price, i.e. at a lower relative marginal cost prior to the trade.
- Comparative advantage describes the economic reality of trade advantages for people, firms, or nations as a result of disparities in their factor endowments or technological progress.
- (The absolute advantage, comparing output per time (labor efficiency) or per quantity of raw material (monetary efficiency), is typically considered more intuitive but less accurate – productive trade is possible as long as the opportunity costs of manufacturing commodities vary between countries.)
Therefore, if the country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost, it has a comparative advantage.
Know more about comparative advantage here:
brainly.com/question/14846093
#SPJ4
Answer: Statement that “There is no need to evaluate mutual fund investments because investment companies hire the best professional managers they can to manage their funds “ is FALSE
A mutual fund is a pool of stocks, bonds or other funds where an investor purchase his shares. He gets one to meet his investment goals so evaluating a mutual fund's performance is needed and must involve thorough research to lessen risk.
Professional fund managers do make mistakes, so it is a must that investors continually evaluate their mutual fund investments.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The business decision based on the company where you work would be this. To open a new small branch of the fast-food restaurant as a concession in the municipal stadium.
The incremental cost is the future costs as a result of this business decision. This means that we have to consider extra money on a monthly basis to pay for the rent of the concession booth at the Municipal stadium.
The opportunity cost is that instead of opening our branch in the new downtown mall, we decided to move with the stadium option. Having decided to be at the mall could have allowed us to have more clients on a daily basis, especially on weekends.
The sunk cost is a cost from the past, an historical cost that really is not important in the present time to make a decision. Maybe, just a reference to a case in the past. And that's it.
Here we can refer to a cost when we opened the first location of the restaurant, but it was five years ago. Those were different situations, necessities, and conditions.
Hey there!
Employers should do random safety checks every so often, maybe every single week. They should do this to ensure that all employees are wearing the right safety equipment along side doing the right procedure.
Hope I was able to help!
