In this question, we're trying to find the inequality that is true.
To find your answer, we can convert the numbers in the absolute value:
|−5| < 4:
5 < 4 <em>false</em>
|−4| < |−5|:
4 < 5 <em>true </em>
|−5| < |4|
5 < 4 <em>false</em>
|−4| < −5
4 < -5 <em>false</em>
The only true inequality here would be |−4| < |−5|, since it works with the inequality sign.
Answer:
|−4| < |−5|
- 38.79
- 3053.63
- 904.78
- 2544.69
- 226.19
- 402.12
- 1072.33
- 1526.81
- 28.73
- 113.1
- 3801.33
- 268.08
- 2094.4
- 75.4
- 94.25
- 37.7
- 1884.96
- 2065.24
- 19861.7
- 1385.44
- 287.98
- 4.19
- 3619.11
- 113.1
- 50.27
I did this really quick so I hope all the answers are right, and double check them if you have time just in case
Given:
Volume of a cube = 27,000 in^3
(Note: A cube has equal sides)
The volume of a cube = a^3
So,
Therefore, the lenght of one side is 30 inches.
Answer:
Follows are the explanation to the given question:
Step-by-step explanation:
Its determination of inventory amounts for various products. Its demand is an excellent illustration of a dynamic optimization model used in my businesses. Throughout this case, its store has restrictions within this room are limited. There are only 100 bottles of beverages to be sold, for instance, so there is a market restriction that no one can sell upwards of 50 plastic cups, 30 power beverages, and 40 nutritional cokes. Throughout this situation, these goods, even the maximum quantity supplied is 30, 18, and 28. The profit for each unit is $1, $1.4, and $0.8, etc. With each form of soft drink to also be calculated, a linear extra value is thus necessary.
A counterexample proves something wrong. To disprove "When it rains, it pours," you could give an example of a time when it rains and does not pour. What if it only rains a little? What if it rains frogs? How are you supposed to "pour" frogs? I dunno. This is sort of an open-ended question. I'd go with "It drizzles, but does not pour."