Answer:
Big buy must sell at large at a smaller price which will give tough time to Radio Shack and this is the threat that RadioShack don't want to bear.
Explanation:
Best Buy will choose large quantity because it helps in satisfying the needs of public at large at a lower price. This will force RadioShack to lower its price which will result in losses and this fear of losses will act as a enterance deterent. Though the profit on this strategy is lower but it will safeguard future revenues as RadioShack will not enter the market or get defeated very quickly.
Answer: $40,710
Explanation:
John's annual compensation includes his actual annual salary as well as the various payments that Heinlein Hillclimbers makes on his behalf.
His total annual compensation is:
= Annual salary + Employer's 401 contribution + Health insurance + Life insurance + AD&D + Profit sharing bonus + Tuition reimbursement + employer only taxes and insurance
= 26,500 + (150 /2 * 12 months) + (150 * 12 months) + (30 * 12 months ) + (50 * 12 months ) + (2% * 26,500) + 5,250 + (18% * 26,500)
= 26,500 + 900 + 1,800 + 360 + 600 + 530 + 5,250 + 4,770
= $40,710
Answer:
if it can be readily exchanged for another asset or good
Explanation:
An asset is liquid if it can be easily be exchanged for another asset or good or converted to cash. cash ( currency) is the most liquid asset.
an house for example is less liquid when compared to cash. this is because before it can be converted to cash or exchanged for another asset, it must first be valued, then we have to find a buyer and this process can range from days to years. this makes a house less liquid when compared with a house.
It should be noted that Perhaps ahead of the times, Talcott Parsons warned of the dangers of the coalescing interests of the top leaders of business, politics, and the military.
<h3>Who is Talcott Parsons?</h3>
Talcott Parsons can be regarded as American sociologist which was famous for structural functionalism.
He stressed about the dangers of the coalescing interests of the top leaders of business, politics.
Learn more about Talcott Parsons at;
brainly.com/question/917245
Answer:
Yes, Tangshan Mining company should accept the project.
Explanation:
Payback period is the number of years it takes for a project's expected cash inflows to recover the initial investment amount.
Tangshan company's required payback period = 3.5 years
<u>Year CF Net CF</u>
0 -5,000,000 -5,000,000
1 1,800,000 -3,200,000
2 1,900,000 -1,300,000
3 700,000 -600,000
4 1,800,000 1,200,000
<em>Payback period = last year with -net CF +(absolute net CF that year /total CF the following year)</em>
Payback period = 3 + (600,000 / 1,800,000)
=3 + 0.33
= 3.33 years
Since 3.33 years is lower than the required payback period of 3.5 years, Tangshan Mining company should ACCEPT the new project; it will take less years to fully recover the initial amount investment.