Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
i aint never seen two pretty best friends its always one of em gotta be ugly
Answer:
The equation of a parabola is
Step-by-step explanation:
(h,k) is the vertex and (f,k) is the focus.
Thus, f = 1, k = −4.
The distance from the focus to the vertex is equal to the distance from the vertex to the directrix: f - h = h - 2.
Solving the system, we get h = 3/2, k = -4, f = 1.
The standard form is:
The general form is:
The vertex form is:
The axis of symmetry is the line perpendicular to the directrix that passes through the vertex and the focus: y = -4.
The focal length is the distance between the focus and the vertex: 1/2.
The focal parameter is the distance between the focus and the directrix: 1.
The latus rectum is parallel to the directrix and passes through the focus: x = 1.
The length of the latus rectum is four times the distance between the vertex and the focus: 2.
The eccentricity of a parabola is always 1.
The x-intercepts can be found by setting y = 0 in the equation and solving for x.
x-intercept:
The y-intercepts can be found by setting x = 0 in the equation and solving for y.
y-intercepts:
The degree of a polynomial is the highest power of its terms.
The power of a term is the sum of the powers of all the variables in a term.
A polynomial is written starting with the greatest power in standard form.
In the first case, the power of the first term is 3, the power of the second is 3 (2 from x + 1 from y) but the power of x has decreased so it is the second term, and then so on.
In the second case, the power is starting form 2 and then increasing to 3. This is incorrect.
Therefore, Marcus' suggestion is correct.
Answer:
y < -2
Step-by-step explanation:
2y < -4
Divide both sides by 2.
y < -2
Answer: A. Repeated results if the player makes 75% of his shots in the long run.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null distribution is always the opposite of the alternative distribution which in most cases represents the claim or hypothesis which is to be tested or performed. In the scenario given, the challenge is to show that a basketball player has an average higher than that of the NBA. NBA average stands at 75%. The alternative hypothesis is the claim, which is ;
H1 : μ > 75%
THE null is thus :
H0 : μ = 75% ; which means that repeated result of the player will yields an average of 75%