Answer:
1. Richard caught the ball, ran for five yards, and scored a touchdown
2. Judy, who works for the local school district, is asking her boss for a raise.
3. I didn't realize, however, that the main character was already dead.
4. I want to buy a shirt, and a pair of shoes.
5. Because we have a test tomorrow, I'm not going to the party.
6. I want to become a doctor, so I have to take a lot of science classes.
7. The man, who is running down the street, usually wears an orange sweatshirt.
8. Did you notice the smart, attractive man sitting in the corner?
9. Her father, a pediatric surgeon, has to work long hours.
10. William Thomas Jr. is a good friend of mine.
Hope this helps
Have a nice day ((:
Explanation:
You can tell if they were influenced either negatively or positively by looking at their connotation and diction
The correct answer is implements.
In the case where there are both the implements and the extends clause present in the class header, the convention is that the first one should be the implements clause, followed by the extends clause.
This makes sense because you first need to implement the meaning you want to talk about, and then you will extend upon it later.
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
