Answer:
I think the answer is D, I am dearly sorry if that is wrong.
Explanation:
Everything said in that paragraph was just about her finding the courage to ask her grandfather to pay for the jacket, I think it is the only one that would match paragraph 14. Looking at the other answer choices i don't see how they would make sense.
The answer is Agression , and violence.
The main difference between the two acts is not in the actions per se, but in Agression, the perpetrator may not really intended to harm others because his/her actions derived from their personal egos in order to appear as capable in order to increase their value. In violence on the other hands, the perpetrators tend to have a big intention to cause harms to their target.
Answer:
Authors reinterpret familiar stories because
Option A. To use shared references that allow the audience to feel more
connected to the story.
Explanation:
Authors refer to familiar stories so that they connect with the audience better. Audience already knows a story and when an author reinterprets that story, audience can better understand his version. They can understand his point of view by use of the shared references of that story which they are aware of.
He doesn't do this to improve the story as per option B. Also, he doesn't use simple dialogue in different languages as Option C. Option D is also incorrect which says that author wants to show advancement of literary and artistic tradition.
Answer:
D. Either of these changes can build tension and suspense.
Explanation:
When a story is presented chronologically, the story is presented in the sequence of events in which it would have occurred. Thus, events will be understood to logically follow one another as things unfold—the order is logical and surprises are rare.
Hope I helped! ☺
The persuasive technique used in the example given above is emotional appeal because it is trying to connect with the consumers emotions by asking about the cellphone that they are using. By doing that, they are trying to tell the consumer that their product can give a better service than the current product that they own.
