Answer:
Yes the absolute privilege for communications made in judicial or other official proceedings apply to statements made when a citizen contracts the police to report suspected criminal activity
Explanation:
Absolute priviledge for communication is the provision that covers a person from legal action on grounds of defamation for statements made. Under certain circumstances a person can make defamatory statements and be immune from legal action.
In this scenario Lydia Harberg went to California Federal Bank to cash a check that was suspected to be fake.
Nolene Showalter contacted SB to confirm. Based on the information provided at that time, the check was confirmed to be fake. The implication was that a fraud was being perpetrated.
So his action of calling the police is justified. SB only verified they gave out wrong information the first time
Answer: False
Explanation: The operations defined in the given problem are performed by the project manager and not the project sponsor.
The project manager is typically considered as the owner of the project. Its main duties relates to providing necessary resources to complete the project. On the other hand the project manager is responsible for completing the project in the way it was planned to be.
Thus, the given statement is false.
Answer:
Shawna needs to consult with a financial advisor to make sure she has not missed any details.
Answer:
$50 and $2
Explanation:
The computation of the total revenue and the marginal revenue is shown below:
Total revenue is
= Price × quantity
= $2 × 25
= $50
And, the marginal revenue is received collected from one unit i.e price of the one units that equivalent to $2
Hence, we simply applied the above formula to determine the total revenue and the marginal revenue
Answer:
<em>The</em><em> </em><em>difference</em><em> </em><em>between</em><em> </em><em>what</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em> costs to make and</em><em>sell a product and what a customer pays for is referred to as</em>
