ll,,Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
0.01133786848
Step-by-step explanation:
First, take three off it, because that will form the whole-number part:
3.92 = 3 + 0.92
Next, read off the place value of the last digit. The 2 is in the 'hundredths' column, which means that 0.92 = 92/100:
3.92 = 3 + 92/100
Finally, simplify 92/100 by dividing top and bottom by 4 to get 23/25. Then, shove it all together:
3.92 = 3 23/25
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Actual question is:</u>
- logf 4(3d) + log4 1 = log4 3d
<u>Solution:</u>
- logf 4 + logf (3d) + 0 = log4 (3d)
- logf 4 + logf (3d) = log4 (3d)
<u>If we assume f = 4, then</u>
- log4 4 + log4 (3d) = log4 (3d)
- log4 4 = 0
but log4 4 = 1
Therefore the statement is False
The final answer would depend in the type of triangle we are analyzing, however here are the possible outcomes:
1.) If it was a right triangle, 36.5 would be the smaller angle.
2.) It cannot be an equilateral triangle since all angles would be 60°.
3.) In a isosceles triangle, 36.5° would be the smaller, since the others would be 72°.
4.) In an scalene triangle it cannot be determined unless we had 2 angles since in that kind of triangle all angles can be different.
5.) In an acute triangle, 36.5° would be the smaller angle.
6.) In an obtuse triangle it cannot be determined unless we had 2 angles, since it can have highly acute angles.
