Charles Dickens was the most remarkable Victorian writer. While he was alive, his works counted with great popularity among all social classes, especially with proletariat, a class which dreadful conditions Dickens denounced through his novels.
When he was twelve years old, he found himself in the necessity to work to help in his home. Despite things got better and there was no need of Charles' money in the house, his mother was not willing to let him stop working and that was a decision the future author of <em>Great Expectations, David Copperfield, A Tale of Two Cities </em>and <em>Oliver Twist</em>, among others, would never forget or forgive.
Orphanhood, poverty, upper classes' abuse, proletariat, loneliness and the promise of and ending that would heal the characters' suffering throughout the story, are the main element of a novelist whose purpose was not only to entertain, but to raise awareness of how the difference between social classes made the most vulnerable pay for their uncommitted sins.
The opportunity cost of going to a night party instead of babysitting at home is:
- The benefit of taking care of the baby adequately and completing your work that you would have gained from babysitting that night.
<h3>What is an opportunity cost?</h3>
This is the loss of value or benefit that would have been incurred by engaging in an activity rather than engaging in an alternative activity.
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the value of what you gave up in other to attend the party, which was to babysit the child and take proper care of the baby.
In conclusion, an opportunity cost is the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is already chosen.
Read more about <em>opportunity cost</em> here:
brainly.com/question/481029
Well, the answer should be D.
Why?
Because not every story doles the character learn something. But in every story there is a conflict.
I believe the answer is B i just took the test sorry if im wrong :)
Answer:
Differences: The movie is set in modern day, not the day that it was written. The fighters have guns in the movie, when in the play they have swords. In the movie, Juliet wakes up immediately after Romeo has taken the poison and they have one last exchange, but that did NOT happen in the pla
In the movie Juliet wakes up before Romeo dies but he already drank the poison. In the book Romeo dies first then Juliet wakes up to see him dead. In the movie Paris never comes to see Juliet and doesn't die. But both the book and the movie they both kill themselves and dies in the end.
Explanation: