Length of deck is 40 feet
<h3><u><em>Solution:</em></u></h3>
Sam wants the deck to have an overall perimeter of 60 feet
Perimeter of rectangular deck = 60 feet
Let "L" be the length of rectangle and "W" be the width of rectangle
Given that plans for a rectangular deck call for the width to be 10 feet less than the length
Width = length - 10
W = L - 10 ------ eqn 1
<em><u>The perimeter of rectangle is given as:</u></em>
perimeter of rectangle = 2(length + width)
Substituting the known values we get,
60 = 2(L + L - 10)
60 = 2(2L - 10)
60 = 4L - 20
80 = 4L
L = 20
Thus the length of deck is 20 feet
area of triangle formula = ½ × B × H
28in2 = ½ × B × (8)
28in2 = 4 × B
28 ÷ 4 = B
Therefore, length of base = 7 inches
i hope my solution helps :))
The function, as presented here, is ambiguous in terms of what's being deivded by what. For the sake of example, I will assume that you meant
3x+5a
<span> f(x)= ------------
</span> x^2-a^2
You are saying that the derivative of this function is 0 when x=12. Let's differentiate f(x) with respect to x and then let x = 12:
(x^2-a^2)(3) -(3x+5a)(2x)
f '(x) = ------------------------------------- = 0 when x = 12
[x^2-a^2]^2
(144-a^2)(3) - (36+5a)(24)
------------------------------------ = 0
[ ]^2
Simplifying,
(144-a^2) - 8(36+5a) = 0
144 - a^2 - 288 - 40a = 0
This can be rewritten as a quadratic in standard form:
-a^2 - 40a - 144 = 0, or a^2 + 40a + 144 = 0.
Solve for a by completing the square:
a^2 + 40a + 20^2 - 20^2 + 144 = 0
(a+20)^2 = 400 - 144 = 156
Then a+20 = sqrt[6(26)] = sqrt[6(2)(13)] = 4(3)(13)= 2sqrt(39)
Finally, a = -20 plus or minus 2sqrt(39)
You must check both answers by subst. into the original equation. Only if the result(s) is(are) true is your solution (value of a) correct.
Distance = rate * time, or rewritten rate = distance / time ---> r = d/t
<span>4 laps, 1 mile per lap = 4 miles = d </span>
<span>12 minutes = 1/5 of hour (12 min/60 min = 1/5) = t </span>
<span>r = 4/(1/5) mph </span>
Answer:
the hypothesis is "two angles are complements"
Step-by-step explanation:
In the given statement, the hypothesis is "two angles are complements".. While the conclusion is that "they are both acute".
The hypothesis of the two angles being complements is what led to the conclusion that they are both acute since sum of 2 complementary angles is 90° and acute angle is any angle that measures less than 90°.
