It can be assumed that $104 worth of Supplies have been used?
Answer:
C) luxury item, an increase
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.
An elastic demand means a small change in price leads to a greater change in quantity demanded.
A luxury good is a good that isn't a necessity. They are usually bought as a status symbol.
Luxury goods usually have elastic demands.
Emeralds are luxury goods and if there's a fall in price of emeralds the quantity demanded of emeralds would rise.
I hope my answer helps you
<span>When there is excess supply of a market product in a market what will happen?
</span>Disequilibrium
<span>With the boom of social media, the customer’s path to purchase has
significantly changed. Traditional, “above-the-line” advertising, specifically
done on TV, print or radio is not as effective as it was before when it comes
to convincing consumers to purchase products. More and more people would resort
to seeking advise and referrals from friends in their respective social
networks. Consumers are wiser now given that they know they have the power to get
real-time information and data simply by the act of crowdsourcing. Engaging
with friends from social media networks would give them access to more genuine
feedback or POV on certain products and services. What traditional advertising
lacks is a venue for consumers to get immediate answers to possible questions
they have on products being advertised. Consumers don’t appreciate information
shoved down their throats as they know that marketers have full control of the
messages being communicated in their ads. It’s too one-sided. There should be a
platform for dialogue which is provided by social media. This is where the
fundamental shift of power takes place as described by Mr. Safco. It’s all about engagement and two-way
communication as he puts it. </span>
Answer:
Dean probably will be able to get the painting back.
A mutual mistake was made since both parties involved, Dean and Susan, made an important factual error. They both were convinced that the painting was an ordinary copy and that it was worth very little money.