Interest rate? Repayment amounts? Length of time of loan? Smile on the face of the money lender? Might there be a little more to this quesition?
Explanation:
1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.
2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable
Measurable:
Experience on the job,
Productivity
Level of education,
immeasurable :
Skill set
Vision
Likeliness to bstay at firm
3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.
4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.
Answer:
Go in for a traditional shirt-jeans outfit and pair it with black formal shoes. A plaid shirt, pair of blue jeans and black dress shoes is how you'll want to rock it! Get that macho look right by wearing a leather jacket over a formal shirt and jeans. Your shoes will complement the jacket perfectly.
Explanation:
Answer:
The cost of opportunity is 4 pancakes.
Explanation:
The cost of opportunity is by definition the amount of things you don't do or buy, because of choosing doing or buying something else. In this case, Maria can make:
This means that at every moment, she can choose to make or 8 pancakes or 2 waffles, but not both. If we continue with this logic, in the time she could make 1 waffle, she could have chosen to make 4 pancakes. This is her cost of opportunity.
The scenario presented for the question:
(i). Revoking an individual's access rights to a particular set of files, but not all files
(ii). Revoking access to a particular file from a group of users, but not all users.
Answer:
(i). Capability List would be a better choice
(ii). Access Control List (acl) would be a better choice.
Explanation:
(i). Revoking an individual's access rights to a particular set of files, but not all files
A capability list is a better choice here. All one needs to do is go to the individual's capability and remove the capability that gives the individual rights over those particular set of files one wants to revoke. This would not be possible for acl, as one would need to go to each file in the particular set of file to be revoked, confirm if the individual has a right for each file and then revoke. This process will take more time.
(ii). Revoking access to a particular file from a group of users, but not all users.
Access Control List (acl) would be a better choice because one can simply access the particular file acl and revoke the rights of the group of users they intend to.This is not the case for capability list, as one would need to confirm from the capability list of each user to know if they have access to the particular file and revoke their access. This will take more time.
