Hey there,
Your question states: <span>Which of the following best explains why zoos are not affected by the threat of new entrants?
Based on the option's above, I feel like the answer would be (</span><span>Starting a zoo has a high entry cost.) Because by doing this, this could make to (zoo) in better quality. So when things go down like (a cage) for example, they could easily pay it back with all the extra money they have.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen</span>
Answer:
b. could be low because people might adjust their expectations quickly if they found anti-inflation policy credible
Explanation:
In the given situation, it is mentioned that the rational expectations proponets said that the sacrified ratio would be lesser as the people wants to adjust their expectations in a fastest way in the case when they found that the anti-inflation policy is credible
Therefore as per the given situation, the option b is correct
Answer and Explanation:
A due on sale clause is simply a stipulation in the mortagage agreement that the
"borrower if he wants to sell the property to some other person, first of all he (borrower) shall repay the entire outstanding mortagage amount and then only it is possible to sell the property which is secured under Mortagage agreement.
Hence in essence, the borrower must repay before selling it to some other person which will result in paying the sale proceeds of house to the lender first and the Borrower again has to take loan sometimes from the same lender.
Hence it is imperative that the mortagage obligation cannot be transferred to any other person. That is any subsequent buyer cannot ASSUME the mortagage. Therefore due on sale
Clause prevents assuming of mortagages.
Answer: I will vote in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, I would vote in favor of the bill. The argument here is in the case of bankruptcy, if an individual is willing to pay their dues but because of unavoidable financial circumstances, the individual seeks more time or other assistance which can help so that the person will later pay. I believe it's a good idea which should be supported by the law.
The court should have the right to decide terms of mortgages to help debtors in order for them to pay their debts in future rather than forcing them to leave the house. It will also help the country deal with issue of facilitating housing to maximum number of individuals.
In my opinion, the judge's decision should be given prime importance as the judge must evaluate the intention of the debtor and the capability of the debtor to pay the debts
Answer:
Year Cash Flow Cumulative Cash flow Discounted Cash Flow(8.9%) 0 $5,095,000 $5,095,000 $453,455 1 $1,500,000 $3,595.000 $3,141,5452 $3,000,000 $ 595,000 $141,5453 $4,500,000 ($3,905,000) $3,4515454 $6,500,000ABC Hospital will get ROI in 3 years, this option I would recommend to the CEO.
Subscribe to unlock