Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Id Definitely Say Shocked, But More Aware.
Answer:
To me my answer is D.
Explanation:
if correct please mark me as Brainliest Answer please please please
Answer:
The textbook explains that when a private business needs finding to arise or to take advantage of additional possibilities, they may prefer to receive financing by going public with their company (Ferrell, Hirt & Ferrell, 2014). This can be achieved through a method known as IPO or initial public offering. This simply means that you become a publicly faded company by marketing stock that can be traded in the public market Ferrel Hur & Ferrell, 2014).
For instance, one of a company that has recently gone public through an IPO is Shake Shack.
Shake Shack went public, though IPO in 2015 (Shake Shack Inc, 2015) Shake Shack portrays themselves as a modern-day roadside burger platform and contributes items such as burgers, and hot dogs.
Explanation:
I don't know if you needed it to be rewritten or something else, but I just put this through Grammarly, double clicked on multiple words that I thought would be best the words changed and chose a different and new word that is/ was similar to the original. I hope this helps.