Answer:
Income = $30,000
Explanation
<em>Whenever a company is faced with a limiting factor i.e a resource in short supply, the company should allocate the resource to the product </em><u><em>with he highest contribution per unit of the scare resource</em></u>
Product Cont/unit machine hr /unit cont/hr Ranking
A $8 2 hrs $4/hr 2nd
B $18 3 hrs $6/hr 1st
<em>Hence the company should allocate the resource to the product B</em>
<em>Hence the total contribution</em>
= 5000 hrs × $6 per hr.
= $30,000
Income = $30,000
Answer:
Dr Notes Payable 349,000
Dr Interest Payable 10,470
Cr Cash 359,470
Explanation:
Preparation of Vaughn's Carpet Service Journal entry
Since we were told that Vaughn's Carpet Service borrows the amount of $349,000 on 1st October from First National Bank based on a 4-month, $349,000, 9% note the transaction will be recorded as :
Dr Notes Payable 349,000
Dr Interest Payable 10,470
Cr Cash 359,470
$349,000 +($349,000 *.09* 4/12)
=$349,000+10,470
=$359,,470
Answer:
1. Nature of commodity
2. Availability of substitutes
3. Income level
4. Postponement of consumption
5. Number of uses
6. Share in total Expenditure
7. Time period
Explanation:
Answer:
The main reasons for policy intervention by the government are:
To correct for market failures.
To achieve a more equitable distribution of income and wealth.
To improve the performance of the economy.
Explanation:
To correct for market failures: This is achieve by creating regulation institutions for the most important sectors in any given economy e.g. Federal Reserve, Treasury Department
To achieve a more equitable distribution of income and wealth: This is the aim of a develop economy to allocate the resources where needed and for that some countries rely in the government capability to prevent Monopoly creation or to protect its Internal Labor market.
To improve the performance of the economy.: In order to meet the economical agenda of any given government the institutions use variation on the interest rate, the government expenditure or the tax policies.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
