i think this would be c let me know if this is right plz and thank you
Simple. First you would make an outline coming up with the reasons that support your subject. Then next you would fill them in a straight line down. So to start your intro write a hook to grab your readers attention. Then after write your supporting reasons after. Thats the intro. After your intro to write your first paragraph write your claim and counterclaim. Like if i was going to say dogs are better then cats i would write"Although dogs are popular pets so are cats but are preferred as they cost less due to survey done by geoplanet or some other company name." The write a another sentence like the first followed by a second just like i did above a topic as well as supporting factor. Then for your second paragraph use your second reason as well as a supporting detail following the same format as your first and then third if your teacher requires it. Then for a conclusion write something like In conclusion "dogs are better since they cost less, love to play, and are good for protection against burglars" to sum up your three reasons.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Definitely Red and I've never heard of Witch of the North.
Answer:
A.) Most Russians in the 1890s were not wealthy.
Explanation:
In the passage, it is described that a majority of Russians only used 8 pounds, while a majority of the British used a whopping 90 pounds. This is more than 9 times the amount that Russian people used.
It is also shown that only the super-wealthy used Sugar in Russia and that the difference between the two was staggering.
