Interpretation is defined as a process of the creation of meaning. Life is a series of events, and with each event we attach a meaning . With each event we decide upon an interpretation . It is with these interpretations or attached meanings that we define who and what we are and what we can have and do. Then we go about life collecting evidence to confirm and validate these interpretations . A person's interpretation of an event can be affected through anger , the feeling of being a victim, not making the right decision, negative interpretation and past events among others. That's why it is so important to learn to be in the moment ' in order to experience the genius of you, who you really are, to experience the infinite . No doubt there is a bigger picture out there for your life; it is up to you to master the art of the interpretation
I would say that the answer is A. It seems like the best choice.
Answer: Credit was not given
Explanation:
Plagiarism is when you take a person's work and pass it as your own work even if you took permission from its owner. Yes, even if a person gives you permission to use their work, you must not pass it as your own as this is plagiarism. You must credit the owner for the work.
I am unsure as to what forms of documentation the question speaks of but if that documentation relates to crediting the original owner for the work and it is missing, then the assignment is plagiarized because it is being passed along as your own even though it isn't. Even if this was not intentional, it is still plagiarism.
Answer: May 25, 1787 it took place at Independence Hall in philidalphia
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
C. The passage has a strong claim that is not backed up by sound reasoning
Explanation:
The passage made a very strong claim at the beginning of the sentence. The statement that young people are an important segment of society is a strong claim and the main argument that should have been backed up by strong reasoning.
The reasoning to back up the claim was out of line for it had no correlation with the main claim/argument of the author. Therefore, the strong claim was not backed up by strong reasoning.
