Answer:
a) > x<-c(1,2,3,4,5)
> y<-c(1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1,6)
> linearmodel<-lm(y~x)
And the output is given by:
> linearmodel
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
1.10 0.98
b)
And if we compare this with the general model
We see that the slope is m= 0.98 and the intercept b = 1.10
Explanation:
Part a
For this case we have the following data:
x: 1,2,3,4,5
y: 1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1, 6
For this case we can use the following R code:
> x<-c(1,2,3,4,5)
> y<-c(1.9,3.5,3.7,5.1,6)
> linearmodel<-lm(y~x)
And the output is given by:
> linearmodel
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
1.10 0.98
Part b
For this case we have the following trend equation given:
And if we compare this with the general model
We see that the slope is m= 0.98 and the intercept b = 1.10
Mass divided by volume is density, while mass times density is volume. you cannot calculate density without volume and you cannot calculate volume without density.
i believe that's the answer.
oh gosh i didn't realize my middle school education involved high school stuff.
Explanation:
Check out the picture I drew for a minute before reading this...
B. Distance [the red line] is a scalar quantity reflecting how far an object has traveled. Displacement [the green line] is a vector quantity reflecting how far an object has moved from a point. The key difference is that distance can be any sort of path while displacement is always a vector (or a straight line) between a starting point and a finishing point. Sometimes distance and displacement are equal to one another. Sometimes you have a distance traveled, but zero displacement overall; which is what's going on in your question.
A. The distance that the racecar traveled is indeed 500m. But at the end of the lap, it is right back where it started. So overall, it has been displaced 0m.
It has a 10 electrons. Since it's atomic number is 11 it must have 11 protons. Also, given that it has a +1 charge, it has one less electron than protons since they have equal but opposite charges.
The number of protons is the mass number minus the atomic number = 23-11= 12 neutrons.
Answer: Its A because i had the same question and it was a