Answer:
The answer to this question is
b. people with a desire for a beverage other than soda or water
Explanation:
The "second" party needed for marketing to occur in this case are people who are in need of the product produced by Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. (I.e the customers ) however, the type of customer that Dr. Pepper Snapple group will seek to have are customer with a desire for a beverage other than soda and water because it's price is comparable to that of soft drink. Which implies that customer with no interest in that kind of product will not buy but will rather stick with their preference for soft drinks since it is the same price with the new product by Dr. Pepper Snapple group.
Hence, Dr. Pepper Snapple group will need to have people with a desire for a beverage other than soda or water for marketing to occur.
Answer:
Answer A
Explanation:
There are several rules of dividends deductions from income making taxable income significantly smaller. Deductions are generally 70% of the dividends received. Second if the company owns a stake in other company larger than 20%, but smaller than 80% dividend deduction from income is 80% of the dividend received and if the other entity is fully owned deductions from the dividend received are 100%
Answer: C. No, but he is liable for another $2 per share.
Explanation:
A stock is not to be issued below its par value as this is the lowest price that it is to be issued at. If a par value is $4 for instance, the stock cannot be issued for anything less than this $4.
In this scenario, the par value is $8 per share which means that Globule Inc. cannot issue this share for less than $8. Kirby in paying only $6, is still liable for $2 so that he can at least pay for the stock at its par value.
Answer:
<em>[C] Go on with the scheduled issue date as planned, issuing the objective report as is even though this may negatively affect business between the two companies.</em>
Explanation:
Although the communication between the two organizations might have a detrimental impact on business, it really is your duty to release the report as it is.
It is unethical to prolong the problem for convenience or as a favor to the executives of the other organization as the study shifts to downplay negativity.