Because the future value of annual premiums deposited in a mutual fund is 755 (F/A, 9%, 45) = $397,023.34, Then, the friend is correct since the mutual fund is roughly three times the sum under the Insurance policy.
<h3>Was Liam's
suggestion correct?</h3>
Generally, Premium payment is mathematically given as
X=60-20
X=45years
Where future value is
755 (F/A, 9%, 45)
In conclusion
755 (F/A, 9%, 45) = 755 * 525.8587
755 (F/A, 9%, 45) = $397,023.34
Read more about Arithmetic
brainly.com/question/22568180
Complete Question
Liam O'Kelly is 20 years old and is thinking about buying a term life insurance policy with his wife as the beneficiary. The quoted annual premium for Liam is $8.39 per thousand dollars of insurance coverage Because Liam wants a $90,000 policy (which is 2.5 times his annual salary), the annual premium would be $755, with the first payment due immediately (i.e., at age 21). A friend of Liam's suggests that the $755 annual premium should be deposited in a good mutual fund rather than in the insurance policy. "If the mutual fund earns 9% per year, you can become a millionaire by the time you retire at age 65," the friend advises.
Yes. Collective bargaining is negotiation of wages working conditions by an organized group of employees (often called a union). The union representatives meet with the employer/employer's representatives to negotiate terms.
Answer:
Letter B is correct.<u> Method of authotity.</u>
Explanation:
The method of acquiring knowledge by authority is one of the most widespread ways of obtaining knowledge in society. It is characterized as the implementation and learning of a new idea or belief because some authority figure affirmed a certain concept as true, which ensures greater reliability. and acceptance. As examples of authorities, we can mention: doctors, teachers, bosses, government, parents and others.
But in an ideal scenario it is important to analyze what methods and sources the authority figures have determined for a conclusion about something, one should seek to exercise critical sense to rationalize the beliefs and decisions that are imposed as truth. .
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.