Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.
3<y<7 y is greater than 3 but less than 7
The rate of each train of the northbound train traveled 10 miles per hour faster than the southbound train 26 miles per hour.
<h3>what is speed?</h3>
Speed is the time rate at which an object is moving along a path
Let the speed of southbound train is x miles/hour
so, northbound train has speed of x+10 miles/hour.
then, Speed of both train = Total distance/ total time
(x+10+x)=210/5
2x+10= 210/5
2x+10= 42
2x= 32
x= 16 miles per hour (southbound train)
northbound train: 16+10=26 miles per hour
Learn more about this concept here:
brainly.com/question/15544987
#SPJ1
