I’m sorry for making it happen again but it’s not like that
Among the choices, letter A. trunk lift can be done with a partner. Trunk rotation and sit-and-reach can be done alone. When doing trunk lift, you can't measure alone on how far you have reached. Your in laying position where you are facing down. Your two hands are pressed under your legs.
Answer:
Article 2 of the UCC(Uniform Commercial Code).
Explanation:
UCC is said to be an acronym which stands for the Uniform Commercial Code; this is seen also to govern many different forms of contract interactions. Article 2 in most cases are seen to cover common issues ranging from
i). Goods definition of i.e any tangible item that can be moved.
ii). Situations involving missing terms in a contract, such as a missing quantity, price etc.
iii) Contract modifications and lastly
iv). Exchanges of consideration for items of value.
Alot of research has shown in most cases that article 2 is a popularly cited provision in this body of statutes, since it governs contracts for the sale of goods between merchants or between a merchant and a non-merchant.
Answer: D - Enforce federal rules on member banks
Explanation:
Just took the test
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
