<span>1.appealing to what is
popular: bandwagon</span>
2.using a celebrity to
advertise a product : transfer
3.using the audience's
feelings as a tool of persuasion : appeal to emotions
4.discrediting someone
by linking him or her to words or ideas having negative associations : name
calling
5.giving only two
choices; ignoring other alternatives : black or white fallacy
Answer: Part A: D They separated into different groups long ago.
Part B: The answer is: "it also seems like they didn't mix much with outside groups until the arrival of Europeans in the seventh century"
Explanation: I took the test hope this helps!
Answer:
Events are decided in advance by powers beyond one's control.
Explanation:
A fatalist is one who believes in fate (happening of events outside a person's control, predetermined by supernatural forces). This definition is also evident from the sentence which he himself says in explanation of fatalist i.e "What will be, will be", meaning what is bound to happen, will happen.
Option A is incorrect because fatalist is derived from fate, not fatal (deadly)
Options B and D are incorrect because they are opposite of what "fate/fatalist" mean.
The answer is B, because you are the person writing the story.
Answer:
Red meat was expensive, and only the rich could afford it
Explanation:
The Elizabethans ate three meals a day like anyone else, the meals varying from a chord to their riches among families. Poorer people could only buy vegetables and white meat such as fish, chicken and rabbits while the rich could eat red meat more consistently. In 1563 Elizabeth created a law that compelled everyone to eat fish meat every Wednesday, Fridays and Saturdays by encouraging the fish industry and reducing the fish price to the poor.