According to a different source, this question refers to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In this case, the court issued a unanimous decision in favor of the Brown family. This decision was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
I would argue that Warren's rhetoric is persuasive and authoritative. He very clearly explains the reasons why the Court reached this decision. This conveys a feeling of knowledge and clarity. The line that I find most moving is:
<em>"To separate [black children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."</em>
I find this line to be very powerful because it gets to the source of the problem. By explaining how black children might feel, it encourages people to rethink segregation. It also supports the idea that all people are equally valuable, regardless of their color.
The answer is going to be the letter B. 794
Answer:
wants Rainsford to survive the hunt
Explanation:
In this short excerpt, it shows a suggestion, friendly request, and advice. This could be helpful for Rainsford. Even though, the general is cynical and makes fun of the accident he knows that this is useful and needs to tell him to avoid this place.
He describes this place with its name and gives a hint that it is not a place to go. His story has an idea that Death Swamp is a bad place, not safe for people and animals. This is his contribution to a dialog with Mr. Rainsford.
The soldiers and the journalists that were writing about it were very close to the action. They wrote about their experiences. Moreover, the Vietnam literature has no “escape hatches” (meaning we don't have comic relief, no moments of romance, and scant emphasis on coming-of-age energy). The primary goal was to make us feel like we were there.