To make it parallel I would say to put it in this format: We can’t go back; to go forward is our only option. This makes the verbs the same.
You need to add more context to this question, or it won’t get answered
Yes you can use i for your thesis
Answer:
1. Sultan told me that the trains were running late.
2. The students demanded that they wanted to learn music.
3. She informed me that she would pick me up tomorrow for lunch.
4. I told Rita that Deepa called me up yesterday.
5. The Principle told us that Mahira would be our new captain.
6. Ramani told the doctor that he was feeling unwell.
Please mark as Brainliest! :)
<u>Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice.</u>
In his 1946 work <em>"Existentialism is Humanism",</em> Sartre explores existentialism and its effect on humanity. He states that a <u>coward</u> is: <em>"defined by the deed that he has done. What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward." </em>The action of the coward defines him, an aspect that can be changed only by him. If he is committed to change what defines him, he can erase the notion of being a coward.
Nevertheless, Sartre mentions that “<em>There is no reality except in action</em>”, and this reveals the <u>importance of reality</u>. Humans, regardless of the outcome of an unattainable future, are still in control of some aspects of their reality through their actions; thus, they can shape their individual futures in a way.
This is <u><em>"total freedom"</em></u> defined solely by the individual, as Sartre says: <em>"Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards." </em>What matters in someone's existence is what is decided. A <u>decision </u>is going to shape someone's reality and will define whether the person is a <em>hero</em> or a <em>coward</em>.<em> </em>