Median- 6
Lower quartile- 3
Upper quartile- 8
Minimum- 1
Maximum- 14
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
Angle 125 degree
Step-by-step explanation:
mark me brainliest
4.50x + 10
X = the amount of pair of socks you buy
Answer:
Robin will have 12 dimes in his pocket.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since;
D = One dime = $0.1
P = One penny = $0.01
Amount to have less = $1.08
From the above, when a dime is changed to a penny, the amount held by Robin will decrease by $0.09. That is,
Decease in holding = D - P = $0.1 - $0.01 = $0.09
Therefore, we have:
Number of dimes = Amount to have less / Decease in holding = $1.08 / $0.09 = 12 dimes
Therefore, Robin will have 12 dimes in his pocket.