He does a personal essay telling what he did in his own words using i and me
The correct answer here would be the third option.
The order of importance would be the best strategy here in my opinion because you would want to stress the most important notion first, which is the part that would be most discussed. The less important details (they are still important though) you would discuss later as in order not to take the focus of the most important thing.
Answer:
There are many explorations to the question: who the gardener was. Some people say that he was only an employee. Some others say that he was Michael’s father, who was working there only to live by the grave of Michael. And the rest even argue that he was lord Christ himself as well. He said ‘son’ rather than ‘nephew’ while leading her to the grave.
But, I think that the gardener was the father of Michel himself. I think so only because the writer says that there was infinite compassion / endless love in his eyes. A human being who has the utmost respect and value for their ones only can have such an attribute. So, the gardener was Michel’s father. If it’s so, we can also guess that he had forgiven Helen for her crime.
Explanation:
Answer:
The book contains photocopies of Jefferson’s original letters. Not only are these letters Jefferson’s actual words, but the copies also present his words in his own handwriting. While the page isn’t the actual letter, Jacob is quoting Jefferson’s actual words and thoughts. Therefore, the book is a primary source document.
Explanation:
Two circumstances fits with the question:
1 - if the chapter's authors based their conclusions on their analysis of primary sources related to the Russian Revolution of 1917
2 - if that chapter were being read to understand how American educators taught Russian history in the 1960s.
The 1960s in America were a confusing period under the shadow of the Cold War. The United States and the Soviet Union were fighting ideologically to prove which system - Capitalism or Communism - was the best. Each side attempted to show the problems and mistakes of each economic system, sometimes almost reaching to fight fiscally. Because of all these misunderstandings and attacks of both sides, it's necessary to be careful with all the material produced at that time, especially a textbook, because the content can be tendencious, and mislead the reader. We ONLY could consider this textbook relevant if the authors were correct on their sources, writing based on researches, and if this textbook would be used to understand how Russian history was taught in the 1960s. Because one way or another, this textbook is outdated a lot!
Answer:
The texts take place in different locations within New York City.
Explanation:
In the first one it says so Carlos was visiting his mother's workplace in the heart of New York City. So the first is in new york island. The second says
It was a gorgeous day on Governors Island, And Governors island is located in new york city so that tells us that the answer is that they are in new york city
