Answer: 7.46%
Explanation:
The CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL is a very useful tool for calculating a firm's Cost of Equity.
The Formula is,
Rc = Rrf + b(Rpm)
Where,
Rc is the Cost of Equity
Rpf is the Risk risk free rate
b is beta
Rpm is the risk premium
Plugging in the digits we have,
Rc = 0.0350 + 0.88(0.045)
= 0.0746
The firm's cost of equity from retained earnings based on the CAPM is therefore 7.46%
Answer:
PMT = $1875.00
Explanation:
The annuity refers to a series of fixed payments made after an equal interval of time and for a definite time period. The formula for the present value of annuity is,
<u />
<u>For ordinary annuity</u>
PV of annuity = PMT * [(1 - (1+IN)^-n) / IN]
Plugging in the values for the available variables. We calculate the PMT to be,
14130.15 = PMT * [(1 - (1+0.08)^-12) / 0.08]
14130.15 = PMT * 7.536078017
14130.15 / 7.536078017 = PMT
PMT = $1875.000493 rounded off to $1875.00
I believe that in such a situation, the thing you should do is say: Mrs. Wilson can't be contacted now, but I will give her your name and number as soon as possible.
That way you won't interrupt your boss, and you will give a polite answer to the person calling.
Answer:
Self- awareness
Explanation:
Self-awareness is the ability to objectively evaluate oneself. It is the ability to check ones current behaviors with his standard.
Answer:
a) Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue
Explanation:
A financial fraud refers to misrepresentation of financial data by inflating or reducing a figure amount with the motive to deceive the users of the financial statements and thereby depict better financial position and state of affairs.
The above concept is also referred to as window dressing of accounts.
In the given case, the purpose behind increasing the value of inventory and creation of miscellaneous expense account is to depict fake financial picture. With an increase in the inventory balance, the profits would be inflated. Crediting miscellaneous expenses again would reduce expenses balances and further inflate the profits.
Thus, Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue when she blindly directed her staff to incorporate such changes.