A hypothesis is only useful when it contains a prediction on the outcome of the experiment or test.
The study of comparative anatomy predates the modern study of evolution. Early evolutionary scientists like Buffon and Lamarck<span> used comparative anatomy to determine relationships between species. Organisms with similar structures, they argued, must have acquired these traits from a common ancestor. Today, comparative anatomy can serve as the first line of reasoning in determining the relatedness of species. However, there are many hidden dangers that make it necessary to support evidence from comparative anatomy with evidence from other fields of study.</span>
Answer:
A) 1:2:1
Explanation:
Incomplete dominance is an effect observed in the organisms in which the neither of the two alleles controlling a trait is dominant or recessive instead produces a phenotype formed by the mixture of the effect of the two alleles. Therefore in incomplete dominance, a new trait is produced which is formed by both the alleles.
In the given question, if incomplete dominance is observed in a monohybrid cross which results in two homozygous genotypes and two heterozygous genotypes. In F2 the phenotypic generation produced will be 1:2:1 as the heterozygous genotype will form a new phenotype.
Thus, Option-A is the correct answer
<span>b. The Vicar of Wakefield
</span><span>Samuel Johnson was referring to a group of English lyric poets when he coined the term "metaphysical poets". These poets lived in the seventeenth century. Their work was mainly about love, humour, love and metaphysical conceits. Their poetry was often far-fetched with unusual metaphors or similes. The metaphysical poets wrote very different poetry from the general style of the other poets of their time. They were not interested in writing about the usual images of nature or classical mythology. </span>