First one: divide multiply 2(1x) which would equal 2x then do 2*3 then u would subtract 5 which should get you to the simplified form 2x+1
Second one: do 3(1x) which would equal 3x then do 7*3 which would equal 21 than do plus 3x which should get you to the simplified form of 6x+21
Third one: Do 4(1x) which equals 4x than do 4*2 which equals 8 than plus eight which should get you to the simplest form of 4x+16
Fourth one: do 4(1x) which would equal 4x then do 4*1 which equals 4 than subtract 6 which should get you to the simplest form of 4x-2
Fifth one: do 2(3x) which equals 6x then do 2*2 which equals 4 than subtract 5x which should get you to the simplest form of x+4
Sixth one: do 5(1x) which equals 5x than do 5*-4 which equals -20 than add 10 which gets you to the simplest form of 5x-10
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The prime numbers are bold:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
a) We can see that as we go higher, twin primes seem less frequent but even considering that, there is an infinite number of twin primes. If you go high enough you will still eventually find a prime that is separated from the next prime number by just one composite number.
b) I think it's interesting the amount of time that has been devoted to prove this conjecture and the amount of mathematicians who have been involved in this. One of the most interesting facts was that in 2004 a purported proof (by R. F. Arenstorf) of the conjecture was published but a serious error was found on it so the conjecture remains open.
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
6 in 2 weeks means 3 a week so 8 times 3 = 24
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
