Answer:
1. Whom was met by you?
2. To whom was the book given by you? OR Whom was the book given to by you?
3. By who were you called a list?
Explanation:
1. This is more simple. You simply find the verb "meet", determine the tense using the auxiliary verb "did" (past tense); from this you get "met". Then identify the subject ("you"), and string it all together with the passive voice form of questions: object + verb + by + subject, or "Whom was met by you?".
2. For this question, the original active voice question was grammatically wrong: it should be "To whom did you give the book?" or "Whom did you give the book to?" Using the same method mentioned in question 1, you'll get the answer.
3. This is a little different from the other two questions, since it's asking about the identity of the subject, not the object. This means the sentence structure should be similar, but with the subject moved to the start. This could technically be done to all of the questions, but most people use the "object + verb to be + verb + by + subject" form for finding the object.
Anyways, back to the question: the form used should be "by + subject + verb to be + object + verb". This explains the answer.
Sorry if I didn't explain the answers that well
The answer will be A. Ann is more forward and outspoken then Margot
Ann says exactly what she is thinking and Margot is more reserved
Good luck :)
The contrast presented here is of the typical theme of Romantic literature, <u>the conflict and resolution between man and nature.</u>
Explanation:
The given lines are a Representative of a very Romantic concern, which is the <u>difference between things that seem important and things that are empirically important.</u>
What seems important is wealth which comes from man's artifice but if one understands nature's spontaneity, they will be able to find the purity of soul within them and only find in them to appreciate art.
<u>Art deriving from nature is also a parallel theme that runs her</u>e.
Answer:
the first person point of view
Explanation:
Do you mean lackluster?
if that is the word then the root word would be luster and the affecting word be lack because you would be lacking luster. does this help?:)