Answer:
Charakan
Explanation:
The odd one out would be Charakan.
Theophrastus, Carl Linnaeus, and Aristotle are all <u>scientists that contributed to the science of classification of living organisms (taxonomy)</u>.
<em>Aristotle was the first scientist to classify living organisms into plant and animal kingdoms based on the artificial system of classification.</em>
<em>Theophrastus was a student of Aristotle and he wrote a book, De Historia Plantarum, classifying about 480 plants.</em>
<em>Carl Linnaeus invented the binomial system of naming living organisms in which organisms are given two names - the species and the genus name. </em>
Charakan has no known contribution to taxonomy. Hence, the name is the only odd one.
Answer:
Los fotorreceptores son neuronas especializadas sensibles a la luz, localizadas en la retina externa de los vertebrados. Los conos y bastones son unas de las células mas especializadas y complejas de nuestro cuerpo. Realizan la conversión de la luz en impulsos nerviosos que el cerebro transforma en imágenes.
Explanation:
Answer:
It's the nature vs nurture situation. While the genetics of a person does control the physical traits he/she may develop, the environment also has a major role to play here. For instance, the person may have the genes for developing a tall height. If, however, that person is not provided with the right kind of nutrition and the right time, it is very likely that he/she will not grow as tall as they had the potential for. Similar explanation for non-physical traits.
This is not an 'either/or' type of argument. Genetics and the environment have a collective impact in shaping the person into who they are and while the balance may shift to one side or the other in certain cases, it does not cancel out or negate the other's effect.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
