Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
Peio is a comune in Trentino in the northern italian region Trentino-Alto Adige/Süditrol, located about 50 kilometres northwest of Trento
:)
We first need to understand what the Oedipus myth is to determine which of the statements is a fact. According to the play, Oedipus was doomed to kill his father and marry his mother, Because of this, his father ordered him be killed. This did not happen and he was abandoned and discovered by a neighboring king. When he was older, he was told this and fled the city to avoid the prophecy coming true. He meets Laius on the road, kills him, and then goes to Corinth, where he marries Laius' wife Jocasta. At the end of the play, Oedipus discovers that Jocasta is his mother and that he has murdered his father, causing him to pluck his eyes out and be exiled from the city because of his sins. With this in mind, we can say that the first choice, that Lauis and Jocasta are his parents, is the best answer here.
I think oral storytelling is b