Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The CEO
's belief that he has placed his firm in a slow-cycle industry where <u>concerns about protecting unique competencies dominate concerns about market share,</u> is true
Basically, the CEO operates in a niche market as is reported in the scenario
<u>Niche marketing refers to competing within a narrowly defined market segment with a specialized offering.</u>
Most small businesses are generally not niche marketers; they simply have a very small share of a large segment <u>whereas niche marketers have a large market share in a small/tight segment.
</u>
Having therefore established his Niche business in a small segment where he has a large market share (otherwise it would not be a niche business), <u>the concerns will be about protecting unique competencies rather than market share</u>
<u />
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>