Answer:
Yes, the given instance is an example of a trade-off.
Explanation:
- The trade-off seems to be a strategy to minimize or surrender one or more favorable results in consideration for increasing either receiving other favorable results to optimize cumulative benefit or efficacy within such conditions.
- The above is indeed a trade-off since the participants are experimenting in exchange again for ice cream individuals have to enjoy. The ice cream manufacturer always gets a review of the technician in exchange for free ice cream.
The balanced equation for the above neutralisation reaction is as follows;
Ca(OH)₂ + 2HCl ----> CaCl₂ + 2H₂O
Stoichiometry of Ca(OH)₂ to HCl is 1:2
number of Ca(OH)₂ moles reacted - 0.250 mol/L x 20.0 x 10⁻³ L = 5.00 x 10⁻³ mol
according to molar ratio of 1:2
number of HCl moles required = 2 x number of Ca(OH)₂ moles reacted
number of HCl moles = 5.00 x 10⁻³ x 2 = 10.0 x 10⁻³ mol
molarity of HCl solution - 0.250 M
there are 0.250 mol in volume of 1 L
therefore 10.0 x 10⁻³ mol in - 10.0 x 10⁻³ mol / 0.250 mol/L = 40.0 mL
40.0 mL of 0.250 M HCl is required
All compounds are molecules because a molecule is 2 or more substances/elements combined and a compound is 2 or more elements combined. But not all molecules are elements because some molecules are just combined substances with no elements combined at all.
I'm pretty sure it's 9726 milligrams of iodine. Hope this helps.
