Answer:
The option that best describes how Anaya effectively uses rhetoric in the excerpt to convince readers that his conclusion is justified is:
B) Anaya establishes his credibility as a published Chicano author by discussing his career experience.
Explanation:
Rhetoric concerns the use of devices and strategies to convince the audience of your opinion or perspective. A commonly efficient way to do so is by establishing your own credibility concerning the subject. That is what Anaya is doing in this excerpt. He gets to talk about language and culture in American literature, and be taken seriously while doing it, due to his credibility as a published Chicano author. His life and career are devoted and dependent on this subject, which gives him some sort of authority to discuss it.
I believe that C & D are both very good answers but the choice that i believe to be accurate is actually :
D.) I hereby declare.
I would of said C.) , but it doesn't quite tell you what the speaker is saying or what the vibe is.
This is the answer because you can feel what the speaker is going to say and it is obvious of what the tone of voice is.
I really hope that this is helping you in some way, have a nice day :)
The two daisy and Tom participate in the tragedy at the end by "retreating" and leaving the damage behind, relying on others to clean up the messes they have made.
Explanation:
- After the death of Gatsby, it all falls on Nick to "telephone news of the catastrophe" to all the villagers in the West Egg and all of the acquaintances of Gatsby.
- Daisy is one of Nick's early calls;he was still sure that she would be interested in her fate but he finds that she and Tom "had gone away early that afternoon, and taken baggage with them.
- In the late October, Nick sees Tom Buchanan in Fifth Avenue by chance. Nick, looked forwarded at what Tom and Daisy did after Gatsby's death
- He refuses to shake hands with him, but Tom behaves as if this looks"crazy."
- Tom says that's not true and his behavior was justified in Tom's eyes.
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.