Flip a coin twenty five times, the purpose of this is to show that theoretical and experimental do not always overlap.
Theoretically, it should be a fifty-fifty chance.
In the experiment because you do it a odd amount of times, 25, each flip will be worth a four percent chance.
You would not be able to make a fifty fifty chance with that amount of flips.
Also here:
1.) 13 Heads, 12 tails
2.) 48% chance for the coin to land on tails, 52% chance for the coin to land on heads.
3.) The theoretical probability of a coin landing on heads is 50% of the time that the coin is flipped. This is because there are two possibilities with an equal likelihood of happening
4) The theoretical probability and experimental probability are different as theoretically there would be an equal likelihood or probability and in the experiement, there was a higher probability for the coin to land on heads.
This is easy once you look at it you just have to move the decimal 7 places and you'll get 24,000,000
Answer:
It is the <em><u>second one</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
1st option does not include the number 2 from the equation above,
and 3 and 4, you do not have to divide anywhere in the equation, so those are no possibly correct.
Answer:
A) 10
Step-by-step explanation:
In the US, a number in scientific notation will have a mantissa (a) such that ...
1 ≤ a < 10
That is, the value of "a" must be between 1 and 10 (not including 10).
_____
<em>Comment on alternatives</em>
In other places or in particular applications (some computer programming languages), the standard form of the number may be a×10^n with ...
0.1 ≤ a < 1
In engineering use, the form of the number is often chosen so that "n" is a multiple of 3, and "a" is in the range ...
1 ≤ a < 1000
This makes it easier to identify and use the appropriate standard SI prefix: nano-, micro-, milli-, kilo-, mega-, giga-, and so on.