Well for one, characterisation is how a writer chooses to reveal a characters personality in a story, through things like physical appearance (shiny hair, blue eyes, nice smile, ect.) and through virtues and faults (brave, attentive, smart - egotistical, bitter, evil.)
Figurative language is basically how you'd describe said chracterisations, through things like personification, hyperbole, metaphors, similes, ect.
So with that being said, figurative language can help characterise a monster by doing more than just saying it's a monster; figurative language can make it /feel/ like a monster to the reader. Figurative language can turn the monster '3-D' (for lack of better words), by saying it has long claws, stinky breath, vicious fangs, a horrifying growl, ect.
My favourite example of figurative language is actually in the childrens book "Where the Wild Things Are" by Maurice Sendak, because it uses simple figurative language. Maurice Sendak describes the wild things as so: "They roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws.'
Had to look for the details and here is my answer.
"Saboteur" is actually a short story that was written by Ha Jin. And based on this story, the quote that best foreshadows the method of revenge by Mr. Chiu is this one: "I shall report you to the Provincial Administration. You'll have to pay for this! You are worse than the Japanese military police." Hope this answer helps.
Not only does the question ask about the price, but it asks about it overall. For example, the rest of the options ask about a tablespoon cost, or about the stocks of only tea, and how it was selling. In conclusion, Option A is the most relevant answer.
The correct answer among all the other choices is A.) It represents the perspective of a Federalist, arguing for a strong centralized government. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
