We know that
[volume of a cube]=b³---------> b=∛Volume
b------> is the side length of a cube
The top block was 64 cm³------> b1=∛64-------> b1=4 cm
The middle block was 125 cm³------> b2=∛125------> b2=<span>5 cm
T</span>he biggest block was 729 cm³------> b3=√729------> b3=<span>9 cm
[</span><span>the stack of blocks tall]=b1+b2+b3-------> 4+5+9-----> 18 cm
</span><span>
the answer is
</span>the stack of blocks was 18 cm tall<span>
</span>
If she runs half the distance to school, and runs the same back, this means that she suns 7/8 miles in a day. In 5 days, 5 x 7/8 = 35/8 miles (or 4.375 miles in 5 days).
Answer: (0.076, 0.140)
Step-by-step explanation:
Confidence interval for population proportion (p) is given by :-
, where = sample proportion.
n= sample size.
= significance level .
= critical z-value (Two tailed)
As per given , we have
sample size : n= 500
The number of Independents.: x= 54
Sample proportion of Independents
Significance level 98% confidence level :
By using z-table , Critical value :
The 98% confidence interval for the true percentage of Independents among Haywards 50,000 registered voters will be :-
Hence, the 98% confidence interval for the true percentage of Independents among Haywards 50,000 registered voters.= (0.076, 0.140)
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is
The standard deviation is
Let assume the level of significance of this test is
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as
=>
=>
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as
=>
=>
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of is
From the value obtained we see that hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Answer:
sorry cant help
Step-by-step explanation: